[S3M-4811] Decision Time — 9 Sep 2009 at 17:01
Angela Constance MP, Livingston voted with the majority (No).
This looks like the vote on S3M-4811
The description in the bulletin on 2009-09-09 is:
*S3M-4811 Michael McMahon on behalf of the Parliamentary Bureau: The Children’s Hearings (Legal Representation) (Scotland) Amendment Rules 2009—That the Parliament agrees that nothing further be done under the Children’s Hearings (Legal Representation) (Scotland) Amendment Rules 2009 (SSI 2009/211).
You can search for this motion (S3M-4811) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The first question is, that motion S3M-4811, in the name of Michael McMahon, on the Children's Hearings Legal Representation (Scotland) Amendment Rules 2009, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Abstentions | Turnout |
Con | 16 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 0 | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 45 | 0 | 97.8% |
LDem | 0 | 15 | 0 | 93.8% |
SNP | 47 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 65 | 60 | 1 | 98.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |