Coroners and Justice Bill — Report (3rd Day) — 28 Oct 2009 at 19:44

Baroness Sharp of Guildford voted with the majority (Not-Content).

Clause 64 : Conspiracy

Amendment 66B

Moved by Lord Thomas of Gresford

66B: Clause 64, leave out Clause 64

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con0 45 (+1 tell)23.5%
Lab78 (+2 tell) 237.4%
LDem38 050.0%
UUP0 3100.0%
Crossbench6 14 (+1 tell)11.1%
Total:122 6427.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Kennedy of The ShawsLabaye
Lord Puttnam Labaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive