Apprenticeships, Skills, Children and Learning Bill — Funding Regional Development Agencies via Skills Funding — 4 Nov 2009 at 16:18
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton voted with the majority (Not-Content).
The Chief Executive may pay to a specified body such sums as appear to the Chief Executive appropriate for enabling the body but excluding a regional body such as a Regional Development Agency to meet costs and expenses incurred, or to be incurred, by it in formulating its strategy or keeping it under review.Immediately prior to the vote Baroness Sharp of Guildford explained why she was pressing for a vote saying: "I am also left with many doubts about whether the old fashioned, top-down labour market planning with our single integrated strategies, our NINJA boards and all the rest of it, is the right way to do it. I would therefore like to test the opinion of the House." The result of the vote not accepting the amendment was: Contents 96; Not-Contents 136.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 1 | 0 | 4.2% |
| Con | 1 | 22 | 11.7% |
| Lab | 114 (+2 tell) | 0 | 53.0% |
| LDem | 0 | 46 (+2 tell) | 63.2% |
| Other | 1 | 1 | 33.3% |
| UUP | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Crossbench | 16 | 25 | 21.7% |
| Total: | 134 | 94 | 32.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Lord Pilkington of Oxenford | Con | no |
