Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (References to Financial Investigators) (Amendment) Order 2009 — Motion to Resolve — 7 Dec 2009 at 16:23
The Earl of Onslow voted with the majority (Teller for the Contents).
Moved By The Earl of Onslow
That this House notes with concern criticisms by the Chairman of the Police Federation of the powers contained in the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (References to Financial Investigators) (Amendment) Order 2009 (SI 2009/2707) laid before the House on 8 October and calls upon Her Majesty's Government to revoke the order. 31st Report, Session 2008-09, from the Merits Committee.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 1 | 0 | 3.8% |
| Con | 89 (+2 tell) | 0 | 46.4% |
| Ind Lab | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 2 | 112 (+2 tell) | 53.2% |
| LDem | 42 | 0 | 55.3% |
| UUP | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Crossbench | 42 | 4 | 24.3% |
| Total: | 179 | 116 | 42.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Lord Rooker | Lab | aye |
| Viscount Simon | Lab | aye |