Bill Presented — Pedicabs Bill — Crime and Security Bill — 18 Jan 2010 at 21:45
Iain Duncan Smith MP, Chingford and Woodford Green did not vote.
I beg to move, That the Bill be now read a Second time.
The Bill builds on an unrivalled record that, since 1997, has seen the first sustained fall in crime for more than 100 years. Overall crime is down by 36 per cent., violent crime by 41 per cent., burglary by 54 per cent. and vehicle crime by 57 per cent. Since 2000, the reoffending rate for both adults and juveniles has fallen by more than 20 per cent. That is a tremendous achievement by our police forces and other agencies across the country. The Bill will build on those achievements by strengthening our efforts to tackle crime and antisocial behaviour among young people. It will bring greater protection to the victims of domestic violence, cut police bureaucracy and establish a new framework for the retention of DNA records.
Question put, That the Bill be now read a Second time.
The House divided: Ayes 272, Noes 197.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 145 (+2 tell) | 0 | 76.2% |
Independent | 0 | 4 | 1 | 83.3% |
Lab | 271 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 78.2% |
LDem | 0 | 44 | 0 | 69.8% |
PC | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 271 | 196 | 1 | 76.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |