Terrorist Asset-Freezing (Temporary Provisions) Bill (Allocation of Time) — Clause 1 — Temporary validity of certain Orders in Council — 8 Feb 2010 at 20:00
Tom Watson MP, West Bromwich East voted with the majority (No).
The majority of MPs voted against introducing shortening the time in which Terrorist Asset-Freezing (Temporary Provisions) Bill was to have effect.
Mark Hoban MP, speaking in favour of the defeated amendment, said[1]:
- It seems to us that measures that were described in the court ruling as draconian should not be kept in place for up to 10 months on the basis of a three clause Bill that perpetuates some of the failings of the underlying orders.
The amendment voted on was:
- page 1, line 3, leave out 31 December 2010 and insert 31 March 2010
- [1] Mark Hoban MP, House of Commons, 8th February 2010
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 0 | 123 (+2 tell) | 0 | 64.8% |
DUP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 12.5% |
Independent | 1 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
Lab | 259 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 74.8% |
LDem | 42 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
PC | 2 | 0 | 0 | 66.7% |
SDLP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 33.3% |
SNP | 2 | 0 | 0 | 28.6% |
Total: | 307 | 125 | 0 | 69.0% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |