[S3M-5809.2 (Amendment)] Decision Time — 25 Feb 2010 at 17:01
This looks like the vote on S3M-5809.2
The description in the bulletin on 2010-02-25 is:
*S3M-5809.2 Ken Macintosh: Education—As an amendment to motion (S3M-5809) in the name of Margaret Smith, leave out from "and that teachers" to end and insert "believes that the professional development of teachers and the updating of their skills is vital to successful implementation; asks the Scottish Government, in conjunction with local authorities, to ensure that the continuing professional development needed to underpin the Curriculum for Excellence is put in place; considers that greater clarity is urgently needed for teachers and parents regarding the impact on subject choice in secondary schools and the standards that will be set for the new levels of qualification, together with reassurance that the necessary resources will be made available, and asks that consideration is given to greater consultation with parents and the involvement of parent representatives in the management and co-ordination of the implementation process." Supported by: Des McNulty*
You can search for this motion (S3M-5809.2) on TheyWorkForYou
Text Introducing Division:
The next question is, that amendment S3M-5809.2, in the name of Ken Macintosh, which seeks to amend motion S3M-5809, in the name of Margaret Smith, on education, as amended, be agreed to. Are we agreed?
No.
There will be a division.
All Votes Cast - sorted by name
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party are marked in red. Also shows which MPs were ministers at the time of this vote. You can also see every eligible MP including those who did not vote in this division.
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote