Digital Economy Bill — ISP obligations to take account of injunctions — 3 Mar 2010 at 16:45
Lord Wedderburn of Charlton voted in the minority (Not-Content).
The majority of Lords voted in favour of add to the list of obligations of internet service providers the fact that it that it may also account of circumstances whereby injunctions for preventing access to specified online locations for the prevention of online copyright infringement may be brought.
After introducing this amendment, he explained
- I apologise for the slightly artificial introduction of this amendment at this point in the proceedings. The use of a paving amendment, Amendment 120A, at this juncture is simply a result of the desire of the signatories to the amendment to ensure a proper debate in prime time in this House of the merits of Clause 17 and our proposed substitute for it.
Clause 17 is entitled Power to amend copyright provisions.
-  Approval of code about the initial obligations, Digital Economy Bill, Clause 6
-  Lord Clement-Jones, House of Lords, 3 March 2010
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Con||99 (+1 tell)||0||51.3%|
|Lab||0||113 (+2 tell)||52.8%|
|LDem||48 (+1 tell)||0||64.5%|