Prevention of Terrorism Act 2005 (Continuance in Force of Sections 1 to 9) Order 2010 — Motion to Approve — 3 Mar 2010 at 21:37
Lord Christopher was absent
Amendment to the Motion
Moved by Lord Lloyd of Berwick
As an amendment to the Motion in the name of Lord West of Spithead, at end to insert "but this House regrets that, following the judgment of the House of Lords in Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF and the subsequent revocation of AF's control order on the ground that he did not have a fair hearing, Her Majesty's Government have not, in the five years since the Act was passed, found a means of dealing with suspected terrorists that is just and effective; and calls on the Government to introduce primary legislation to limit the duration of control orders to a maximum of one year, without renewal".
Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please
consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Con | 1 | 0 | 0.5% |
Crossbench | 9 (+1 tell) | 2 | 6.5% |
Lab | 0 | 39 (+2 tell) | 19.0% |
LDem | 37 (+1 tell) | 0 | 50.7% |
UUP | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
Total: | 48 | 41 | 13.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Baroness Deech | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Elystan-Morgan | Crossbench | no |