Crime and Security Bill — Committee (and remaining stages) — 7 Apr 2010 at 20:50

Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws voted in the minority (Not-Content).

Clauses 14 to 33 agreed.

Clause 34 : Grant of injunction: minimum age

Debate on whether Clause 34 should stand part of the Bill.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con55 331.0%
Crossbench12 710.1%
DUP2 066.7%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Lab87 (+2 tell) 142.1%
LDem0 43 (+2 tell)60.8%
Other1 09.1%
Total:158 5431.9%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord James of BlackheathCon (front bench)no
Lord Marland Conno
Lord Marlesford Con (front bench)no
Lord Alton of LiverpoolCrossbenchno
The Earl of ErrollCrossbench (front bench)no
The Earl of ListowelCrossbenchno
Lord Lloyd of BerwickCrossbench (front bench)no
Baroness O'Loan Crossbenchno
Lord Walpole Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Wilson of TillyornCrossbenchno
Baroness Kennedy of The ShawsLabno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive