Crime and Security Bill — Committee (and remaining stages) — 7 Apr 2010 at 20:50
The Earl of Lindsay was absent
Clauses 14 to 33 agreed.
Clause 34 : Grant of injunction: minimum age
Debate on whether Clause 34 should stand part of the Bill.
Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please
consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Con | 55 | 3 | 30.5% |
Crossbench | 12 | 7 | 10.0% |
DUP | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 87 (+2 tell) | 1 | 41.7% |
LDem | 0 | 43 (+2 tell) | 60.0% |
Total: | 157 | 54 | 31.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord James of Blackheath | Con (front bench) | no |
Lord Marland | Con | no |
Lord Marlesford | Con | no |
Lord Alton of Liverpool | Crossbench | no |
The Earl of Erroll | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
The Earl of Listowel | Crossbench | no |
Lord Lloyd of Berwick | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Baroness O'Loan | Crossbench | no |
Lord Walpole | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Wilson of Tillyorn | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Kennedy of The Shaws | Lab | no |