Academies Bill [HL] — Report (1st Day) — 6 Jul 2010 at 16:56
Lord Armstrong of Ilminster voted with the majority (Not-Content).
Moved by Lord Phillips of Sudbury
1: Clause 1, page 1, line 4, at end insert-
"( ) In considering an application by any person to enter into any Academy arrangements, the Secretary of State shall inter alia take into account the potential impact on schools which may be affected."
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Con||140 (+1 tell)||0||74.2%|
|Lab||0||137 (+2 tell)||61.5%|
|LDem||50 (+1 tell)||0||66.2%|
|The Bishop of Chester||Bishop||no|
|Baroness Campbell of Loughborough||Crossbench||aye|
|The Earl of Clancarty||Crossbench||aye|
|Lord Kerr of Kinlochard||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|The Earl of Listowel||Crossbench||aye|
|Lord Low of Dalston||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Patel of Bradford||Crossbench||aye|
|Lord Wedderburn of Charlton||Crossbench||aye|