Academies Bill [HL] — Report (1st Day) — 6 Jul 2010 at 16:56

Lord Armstrong of Ilminster voted with the majority (Not-Content).

Amendment 1

Moved by Lord Phillips of Sudbury

1: Clause 1, page 1, line 4, at end insert-

"( ) In considering an application by any person to enter into any Academy arrangements, the Secretary of State shall inter alia take into account the potential impact on schools which may be affected."

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Bishop1 211.5%
Con140 (+1 tell) 071.9%
DUP3 075.0%
Lab0 140 (+2 tell)61.5%
LDem50 (+1 tell) 064.6%
Other0 250.0%
UKIP1 050.0%
UUP1 033.3%
Crossbench41 926.5%
Total:237 15353.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
The Bishop of ChesterBishopno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive