Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill — New Clause 5 — Memorandum of Understanding on Roles of Chief Constables vs Police and Crime Commissioners — 30 Mar 2011 at 17:00
Dominic Grieve MP, Beaconsfield voted against requiring The Secretary of State to publish a Memorandum of Understanding on the Operational Responsibility of Chief Constables detailing where their actions shall be independent of the Police and Crime Commissioner.
The majority of MPs voted against requiring The Secretary of State to publish a Memorandum of Understanding on the Operational Responsibility of Chief Constables detailing where their actions shall be independent of the Police and Crime Commissioner.
MPs were considering the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill. The motion rejected in this vote was:
- That the clause be read a Second time.
The clause in question required the publication of the Memorandum of Understanding
-  Parliament's webpage on the Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill (now an Act)
-  Official Record, House of Commons, 30 March 2011
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||268 (+2 tell)||0||0||88.2%|
|Lab||0||208 (+2 tell)||0||81.4%|
|Nigel Dodds||Belfast North||DUP (front bench)||no|