Postal Services Bill — Report (1st Day) — 4 May 2011 at 18:19
Lord Thomas of Gresford voted with the majority (Not-Content).
Amendment 5 not moved.
Moved by Baroness Wilcox
6: Clause 2, page 2, line 5, at end insert ", and
(c) the objective intended to be achieved by the undertaking of it.
(3A) The report must-
(a) contain information about the expected commercial relationship, after the proposed disposal, between the Royal Mail company in question and any Post Office company, and
(b) if the proposed disposal would result in shares or share rights being owned by or on behalf of an employee share scheme for the first time, give details of the scheme.
In paragraph (b) "employee share scheme" has the meaning given by section 3."
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Con||122 (+2 tell)||0||55.6%|
|Lab||0||123 (+2 tell)||51.0%|
|The Earl of Clancarty||Crossbench||aye|
|Baroness D'Souza||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Low of Dalston||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Martin of Springburn||Crossbench||aye|
|Lord Palmer||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Patel of Bradford||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness Young of Hornsey||Crossbench (front bench)||aye|