Localism Bill — Clause 90 — Production of Joint Infrastructure Planning Guidance — 17 May 2011 at 22:26

Jo Swinson MP, East Dunbartonshire voted against being more prescriptive about the collaborative process for producing Joint Infrastructure Planning Guidance.

The majority of MPs voted against being more prescriptive about the collaborative process for producing Joint Infrastructure Planning Guidance.

The text of the rejected amendment was:

  • Amendment 298, page 61, line 20, at end insert—
  • ‘(3A) The preparation of Joint Infrastructure Planning Guidance within subsection (3) must involve—
  • (a) a local planning authority who is also a member of a Local Enterprise Partnership as approved by the Secretary of State; and
  • (b) every other person within subsection (1).
  • (3B) The preparation of Joint Infrastructure Planning Guidance within subsection (3) includes in particular—
  • (a) the collection of evidence on issues defined in subsection (3C);
  • (b) the preparation of policy guidance in relation to issues defined in subsection (3C); and
  • (c) any other activities that support joint infrastructure planning.
  • (3C) For the purpose of subsection (3B) the issues to be addressed include—
  • (a) housing needs;
  • (b) climate mitigation and adaptation and in particular flood risk;
  • (c) economic development including retail needs;
  • (d) energy needs and capacity;
  • (e) biodiversity;
  • (f) natural resource use including water management; and
  • (g) transport.
  • (3D) The person or bodies defined in subsection (1) must exercise the function of Joint Infrastructure Planning with the aim of achieving sustainable development and must act under guidance, including as to the meaning of sustainable development, as set out in the UK Sustainable Development Strategy.’.

This amendment would have taken effect on Clause 90 of the Localism Bill as at the time of the vote[2].

==

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con260 (+1 tell) 0085.3%
DUP8 00100.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Lab0 207 (+2 tell)081.3%
LDem45 (+1 tell) 0080.7%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 1033.3%
Total:313 212083.3%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive