Pensions Bill 2010/11 — Second Reading — 20 Jun 2011 at 21:40
Maria Miller MP, Basingstoke voted with the majority (Aye).
The Majority of MPs voted to allow the Pensions Bill[1] to be read a second time, so continue on its path to becoming law.
The bill discusses a number of different elements including changes to the qualifying state pensions age, amendments to automatic enrolment provisions by employers, re-evaluation of the index used to calculate occupational pension schemes, and judicial pension contributions.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
| Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
| Con | 260 (+1 tell) | 0 | 0 | 85.3% |
| DUP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 25.0% |
| Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 0 | 220 (+2 tell) | 0 | 86.4% |
| LDem | 42 (+1 tell) | 0 | 0 | 75.4% |
| PC | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| SDLP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
| SNP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 302 | 232 | 0 | 83.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||