Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill — Report (3rd Day) — 11 Jul 2011 at 15:41
Baroness Masham of Ilton voted with the majority (Not-Content).
Schedule 5: Issuing precepts
Amendment 101
Moved by Lord Beecham
101: Schedule 5, page 116, line 2, at end insert-
"( ) A decision to amend or veto a proposed precept must be agreed by a two-thirds majority."
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Not-Content) | Minority (Content) | Turnout |
Con | 123 (+1 tell) | 0 | 55.9% |
Crossbench | 14 | 36 | 26.2% |
DUP | 3 | 0 | 75.0% |
Independent Labour | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 135 (+2 tell) | 55.2% |
LDem | 53 (+1 tell) | 1 | 56.7% |
PC | 0 | 1 | 100.0% |
UUP | 1 | 0 | 25.0% |
Total: | 194 | 174 | 48.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Bew | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Bramall | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Campbell of Surbiton | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Viscount Craigavon | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Dannatt | Crossbench | no |
Lord Dear | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Eames | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
The Earl of Erroll | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Inge | Crossbench | no |
Lord Jay of Ewelme | Crossbench | no |
Lord Kakkar | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Masham of Ilton | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Tanlaw | Crossbench | no |
Lord Walpole | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Baroness Harris of Richmond | LDem (front bench) | aye |