Police Reform and Social Responsibility Bill — Report (3rd Day) — 11 Jul 2011 at 16:54
The Earl of Caithness voted with the majority (Not-Content).
Amendment 103 agreed.
Amendment 104 not moved.
Clause 29 : Police and crime panels outside London
Tabled by Lord Elystan-Morgan
105: Clause 29, page 20, line 29, after "area" insert "in England"
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Con||134 (+1 tell)||0||60.8%|
|Lab||0||155 (+2 tell)||64.3%|
|LDem||60 (+1 tell)||1||65.3%|
|Lord Bew||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Cameron of Dillington||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Campbell of Surbiton||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Viscount Craigavon||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Dear||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Hannay of Chiswick||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Hylton||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Inge||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Viscount Montgomery of Alamein||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Patel||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Powell of Bayswater||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Prashar||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Rowe-Beddoe||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lady Saltoun of Abernethy||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Sutherland of Houndwood||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Thomas of Swynnerton||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Walpole||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Walton of Detchant||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Williamson of Horton||Crossbench||no|
|Baroness Harris of Richmond||LDem (front bench)||aye|