Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill — New Clause 1 — Relocation of Terrorist Suspects — 5 Sep 2011 at 21:00
Mark Reckless MP, Rochester and Strood voted against allowing a Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures notice to require an individual reside at any location in the UK.
The majority of MPs voted against allowing a Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures notice to require an individual reside at any location in the UK.
- The Secretary of State may include in a TPIM Notice a requirement that an individual shall reside at a specified address in any place in the United Kingdom if the conditions in paragraphs (a) or (b) are met—
- (a) the Secretary of State must reasonably believe that the individual is more likely to be involved in terrorism-related activity if he resides at his own residence, or
- (b) the individual is more likely to be involved in terrorism-related activity if he resides in a locality in the United Kingdom with which he has a connection.’.
-  Parliament's webpage on the Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill (now an Act)
-  New Clause 1 proposed for the Terrorism Prevention and Investigation Measures Bill
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||260 (+1 tell)||0||0||85.3%|
|Lab||2||210 (+2 tell)||0||82.9%|
|LDem||42 (+1 tell)||0||0||75.4%|
|Jeremy Corbyn||Islington North||Lab (minister)||no|
|John Martin McDonnell||Hayes and Harlington||Lab||no|