Legislation (Territorial Extent) Bill — Third Reading — Impact of Bills on Each Part of the United Kingdom — 9 Sep 2011 at 13:15
Oliver Heald MP, North East Hertfordshire voted for the legal and financial effect of draft Bills on each part of the United Kingdom to be separately and clearly identified.
The majority of MPs voted against the legal and financial effect of draft Bills on each part of the United Kingdom to be separately and clearly identified.
MPs were considering the Legislation (Territorial Extent) Bill[1]. The following motion was rejected in this vote:
- That the Bill be now read the Third time.
The rejection of the motion meant the Bill was dropped and made no further progress towards becoming law.
The effect of the Bill was intended to be as summarised above.
==
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 18 (+2 tell) | 21 (+2 tell) | 0 | 14.1% |
Lab | 16 | 1 | 1 | 7.0% |
LDem | 5 | 0 | 0 | 8.8% |
SNP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 16.7% |
Total: | 39 | 23 | 1 | 10.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote