Health and Social Care Bill — select comittee to scrutinise Bill — 12 Oct 2011 at 14:22

Lord Low of Dalston voted in the minority (Content).

The majority of Lords voted to reject Lord Owen's proposal to have the Health and Social Care Bill scrutinised by a special select committee instead of by the full House of Lords.

The proposal would have delayed the Bill, and would have probably led to large sections of the Bill being re-written. Mark D'Arcy: "Influential peers are gearing up to re-write large sections of it".

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Bishop0 625.0%
Con194 (+1 tell) 085.5%
DUP0 375.0%
Ind Lab1 0100.0%
Lab0 19878.6%
LDem80 (+1 tell) 385.7%
Other0 250.0%
PC0 1100.0%
UUP2 175.0%
Crossbench51 44 (+2 tell)51.1%
Total:328 25873.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Viscount Falkland LDemaye
Baroness Nicholson of WinterbourneLDemaye
Baroness Tonge LDemaye
Lord Rogan UUPaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive