Education Bill — Report (1st Day) — 18 Oct 2011 at 19:08
Baroness Paisley of St George's voted with the majority (Not-Content).
Amendments 8 to 10 not moved.
Clause 3 : Powers of members of staff at further education institutions to search students
Amendments 11 to 14 not moved.
Clause 4 : Exclusion of pupils from schools in England: review
Moved by Lord Low of Dalston
15: Clause 4, page 8, line 22, at end insert-
"( ) Regulations must make provision that if a pupil has been excluded from school for a fixed period on two or more occasions in a 12 month period or is at risk of permanent exclusion, a head teacher shall ensure that-
(a) there is an assessment of whether that child has unidentified learning needs;
(b) there is a review of the effectiveness of the special educational provision being made if that pupil has identified special educational needs;
(c) there is a review of the effectiveness of the reasonable adjustments being made if that pupil has disability."
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Con||95 (+1 tell)||0||43.0%|
|Lab||0||109 (+2 tell)||45.5%|
|LDem||58 (+1 tell)||0||62.8%|
|Lord Armstrong of Ilminster||Crossbench||no|
|Viscount Craigavon||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|The Earl of Erroll||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Howe of Idlicote||Crossbench||no|
|The Earl of Lytton||Crossbench||no|