Foreign and Commonwealth Office — Schedule 1 — Power to abolish: bodies and offices — 25 Oct 2011 at 21:00
Paul Burstow MP, Sutton and Cheam voted with the majority (No).
I beg to move amendment 2, page 24, in schedule 5, leave out lines 9 and 10.
In the past few days, many Members will have received e-mails from their constituents about the important issue of the chief coroner’s office. I want to begin by thanking colleagues from across the House for their kind expressions of support for the amendment, and on the broader question of the necessity of change in the coronial system. I tabled the amendment with the full support of the Royal British Legion, Inquest and the British Medical Association, and I have recently found out that Liberty also supports it, which might divide opinion on this side of the House. All those organisations want to see a chief coroner appointed as soon as possible, and my amendment would achieve exactly what the British Legion and others are asking for. Put simply, leaving out lines 9 and 10 would ensure that the chief coroner-a post agreed on a cross-party basis-is left out of the Bill.
Ayes 235, Noes 287.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||256 (+1 tell)||3 (+1 tell)||0||85.3%|
|Lab||0||214 (+1 tell)||0||83.3%|
|LDem||30 (+1 tell)||1||1||57.9%|
|James Gray||North Wiltshire||Con||aye|
|Gordon Henderson||Sittingbourne and Sheppey||Con||aye|
|Andrew Percy||Brigg and Goole||Con||aye|
|Greg Mulholland||Leeds North West||LDem||aye|