Regulation of Hairdressers — Fines for Hairdressing Commercially Without a Licence — 30 Nov 2011 at 14:37
John Hemming MP, Birmingham, Yardley voted both ways.
The majority of MPs voted against introducing greater regulation for hairdressers including fines for hairdressing commercially without a licence.
The motion rejected in this vote was:
- That leave be given to bring in a Bill to amend the Hairdressers (Registration) Act 1964 to provide for the mandatory registration of hairdressers with the Hairdressing Council;
- to empower the Hairdressing Council to issue and charge for licences to hairdressers holding certain qualifications;
- to provide for the removal of names from the register by the Hairdressing Council on the recommendation of its investigating and disciplinary committees;
- to introduce a scale of fines payable by those without a licence charging for hairdressing services; and for connected purposes.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||42 (+2 tell)||23 (+2 tell)||0||22.5%|