Welfare Reform Bill — Clause 11 — Housing costs — Exemptions from Benefit Reductions Due to Excess Bedrooms — 21 Feb 2012 at 16:56

Jamie Reed MP, Copeland voted to exclude people in specified circumstances from a reduction in housing benefits due to being deemed to have excess bedrooms.

The majority of MPs voted against adding proposed exclusions from any reduction in housing benefits due to people being deemed to have excess bedrooms.

The majority of MPs who voted supported the following motion:

  • That this House disagrees with the Lords in their amendments 3B and 26B.

The effect of the rejected amendment 3B[1] would have been to prevent a loss of benefit for those deemed to have more bedrooms than they require in particular cases. The specified circumstances the amendment would have exempted were: where a council or registered social landlord was unable to provide suitable alternative accommodation and where the property in question had only one excess bedroom and either the claimant was not subject to work related requirements; responsible for a child with illness or disability related benefits; was a war widow or widower or were routinely providing foster care placements.

Amendment 3B referred to the housing related element of universal credit and 26B[1] had the same effect in relation to the Appropriate Maximum Housing Benefit (AMHB). Housing benefit is the current system for benefits payments relating to housing costs, such payments are intended to become the housing related element of universal credit.

Had these amendments been agreed they would have resulted in more money being spent on benefits paid out in relation to housing.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con280 (+1 tell) 2092.5%
DUP0 4050.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Ind0 10100.0%
Lab0 235 (+2 tell)091.9%
LDem36 (+1 tell) 9080.7%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 30100.0%
SNP0 4066.7%
Total:316 263090.5%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Gordon HendersonSittingbourne and SheppeyConno
Andrew PercyBrigg and GooleConno
Annette BrookeMid Dorset and North PooleLDemno
Michael CrockartEdinburgh WestLDemno
Mike HancockPortsmouth SouthLDemno
John LeechManchester, WithingtonLDemno
Greg MulhollandLeeds North WestLDemno
Bob RussellColchesterLDemno
Adrian SandersTorbayLDemno
Ian SwalesRedcarLDemno
David WardBradford EastLDemno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive