Diabetes Prevention (Soft Drinks) — Clause 209 — The Bank Levy — 18 Apr 2012 at 17:45
Nick Herbert MP, Arundel and South Downs voted with the majority (No).
I beg to move amendment 5, page 121, line 19, at end add-
‘(2) The Chancellor of the Exchequer shall review the possibility of incorporating a bank payroll tax within the bank levy and publish a report, within six months of the passing of this Act, on how the additional revenue raised would be invested to create new jobs and tackle unemployment.’.
Ayes 251, Noes 322.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
| Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
| Alliance | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Con | 279 (+1 tell) | 0 | 0 | 91.5% |
| DUP | 0 | 5 | 0 | 62.5% |
| Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Ind | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 0 | 232 (+2 tell) | 0 | 91.1% |
| LDem | 43 (+1 tell) | 0 | 0 | 77.2% |
| PC | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Res | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| SDLP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
| SNP | 0 | 6 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 322 | 251 | 0 | 89.6% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
| Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
| no rebellions | ||||