Business of the House — Schedule 1 — High income child benefit charge — 19 Apr 2012 at 18:00
David Laws MP, Yeovil voted with the majority (No).
Amendment proposed: 28, page 131, line 24, in schedule 1, at end insert-
‘(5) A person (P) is not liable to a high income child benefit charge if the total adjusted net income for the year of that person and any partner does not exceed £100,000’.-(Mr Chope.)
Question put, That the amendment be made.
The Committee divided:
Ayes 240, Noes 283.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||244 (+1 tell)||10 (+2 tell)||0||84.0%|
|LDem||39 (+1 tell)||0||0||70.2%|
|Nadine Dorries||Mid Bedfordshire||Con||aye|
|Anne Main||St Albans||Con||aye|
|David Nuttall||Bury North||Con||aye|
|Mark Pritchard||The Wrekin||Con||aye|
|Mark Reckless||Rochester and Strood||Con||tellaye|