Financial Services Bill — Programme — 23 Apr 2012 at 17:03
Edward Garnier MP, Harborough voted in favour of a proposed timetable for the consideration of the Financial Services Bill.
The majority of MPs voted in favour of a proposed timetable[1] for the consideration of the Financial Services Bill[2].
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (Aye) | Minority (No) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 231 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 76.1% |
DUP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 25.0% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 175 (+2 tell) | 0 | 68.9% |
LDem | 46 | 0 | 0 | 80.7% |
PC | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
SDLP | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
SNP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
Total: | 277 | 183 | 0 | 72.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |