Draft Sexual Offences Act 2003 (Remedial) Order 2012 — Mechinism For Review of Indefinite Notification Requirements — 27 Jun 2012 at 19:32
John Penrose MP, Weston-Super-Mare voted to introduce a mechanism for reviewing indefinite notification requirements under the Sexual Offences Act 2003.
The majority of MPs voted to introduce a mechanism for people subject to indefinite notification requirements under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 to apply for a review and determination that those requirements shall cease.
The motion approved by the majority of MPs was:
- That the draft Sexual Offences Act 2003 (Remedial) Order 2012, which was laid before this House on 5 March 2012, in the previous Session of Parliament, be approved.
This law was proposed following a UK Supreme Court judgement which determined the indefinite notification requirements in section 82(1) of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 are incompatible with article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
-  R (on the application of F (by his litigation friend F)) and Thompson (FC) (Respondents) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Appellant), 21 April 2010.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Bill Cash||Stone||Con (front bench)||no|
|Chris Heaton-Harris||Daventry||Con (front bench)||no|
|Gordon Henderson||Sittingbourne and Sheppey||Con (front bench)||no|
|Jason McCartney||Colne Valley||Con||no|
|David Nuttall||Bury North||Con (front bench)||no|
|Mark Reckless||Rochester and Strood||Con (front bench)||no|
|Henry Smith||Crawley||Con (front bench)||no|
|Hazel Blears||Salford and Eccles||Lab (minister)||aye|
|Kate Hoey||Vauxhall||Lab (minister)||aye|