Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill — Commons Reasons and Amendments — 22 Apr 2013 at 22:11

Lords Amendment 36: Clause 56, page55, line 8, leave out subsection (6).

Commons disagreement and reason

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendment No. 36 for the following Reason-

36A: Because it is more appropriate for the Commission for Equality and Human Rights to monitor progress by reference to its duties under sections 8 and 9 of the Equality Act 2006.

Motion B

Moved by Baroness Stowell of Beeston

That this House do not insist on its Amendment 36, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 36A.

Motion B1

Moved by Baroness Campbell of Surbiton

As an amendment to Motion B, leave out from "House" to end and insert "do insist on its Amendment 36".

Motion B1 agreed.

Lords Amendment37: After Clause 56, insert the following new Clause-

"Equality Act 2010: caste discrimination

(1) The Equality Act 2010 is amended as follows.

(2) After section 9(1)(c) (race) insert-

"(d) caste;"."

Commons disagreement and reason

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendment No. 37 for the following Reason-

37A: Because it is inappropriate to provide for caste to be an aspect of race for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 without further consultation.

Motion C

Moved by Baroness Stowell of Beeston

That this House do not insist on its Amendment 37, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 37A.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop2 08.0%
Con2 132 (+1 tell)60.3%
DUP1 025.0%
Ind Lab0 1100.0%
Judge1 07.1%
Lab129 (+2 tell) 054.8%
LDem19 30 (+1 tell)51.5%
Non-affiliated1 025.0%
PC1 0100.0%
UUP0 133.3%
Crossbench23 213.0%
Total:179 16643.4%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Flather Conaye
Lord Lucas Conaye
Lord Avebury LDemaye
Lord Burnett LDemaye
Lord Clement-Jones LDemaye
Lord Cotter LDemaye
Baroness Doocey LDemaye
Baroness Falkner of MargravineLDemaye
Baroness Harris of RichmondLDemaye
Lord Hussain LDemaye
Baroness Hussein-Ece LDemaye
Baroness Linklater of ButterstoneLDemaye
Lord Phillips of SudburyLDemaye
Lord Roberts of LlandudnoLDemaye
Baroness Sharp of GuildfordLDemaye
Lord Shipley LDemaye
Lord Steel of AikwoodLDemaye
Lord Taverne LDemaye
Baroness Tonge LDemaye
Lord Tope LDemaye
Lord Tyler LDemaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive