Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Bill — Commons Reasons and Amendments — 22 Apr 2013 at 20:23
Lord Prescott was absent
Lords Amendment35: Clause 56, page 54, line 40, leave out paragraph (a)
Commons disagreement and reason
The Commons disagree to Lords Amendment No. 35 for the following Reason-
35A: Because it is appropriate for section 3 of the Equality Act 2006 to be repealed.
Moved by Baroness Stowell of Beeston
That this House do not insist on its Amendment 35, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 35A.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Con||1||142 (+1 tell)||66.1%|
|Crossbench||27 (+2 tell)||3||16.8%|
|LDem||18||31 (+1 tell)||53.8%|
|Lord Cormack||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Viscount Craigavon||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Mawson||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Addington||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Avebury||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Clement-Jones||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Dholakia||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Baroness Doocey||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Fearn||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Phillips of Sudbury||LDem||aye|
|Lord Rennard||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Roberts of Llandudno||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Steel of Aikwood||LDem||aye|
|Lord Thomas of Gresford||LDem||aye|