Growth and Infrastructure Bill — Commons Amendments — 24 Apr 2013 at 19:18

Lord Prescott voted in the minority (Content).

Lords Amendment25: Leave out Clause 27

Commons disagreement and reason

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendment No. 25 for the following Reason-

25A: Because the new status of employee shareholder should be made available.

Lords insistence and reason

The Lords insist on their Amendment No. 25 for the following Reason-

25B: Because it is inappropriate for employees to be exempted from statutory employment rights in this manner.

Commons insistence and amendments to words so restored to the Bill

The Commons insist on their disagreement to Lords Amendment No. 25 but propose the following amendments to the words restored to the Bill by that disagreement-

25C: Page 34, line 13, after "£2,000," insert-

"(ca) the company gives the individual a written statement of the particulars of the status of employee shareholder and of the rights which attach to the shares referred to in paragraph (b) ("the employee shares") (see subsection (4A)),"

25D: Page 34, line 38, at end insert-

"(4A) The statement referred to in subsection (1)(ca) must-

(a) state that, as an employee shareholder, the individual would not have the rights specified in subsection (2),

(b) specify the notice periods that would apply in the individual's case as a result of subsections (3) and (4),

(c) state whether any voting rights attach to the employee shares,

(d) state whether the employee shares carry any rights to dividends,

(e) state whether the employee shares would, if the company were wound up, confer any rights to participate in the distribution of any surplus assets,

(f) if the company has more than one class of shares and any of the rights referred to in paragraphs (c) to (e) attach to the employee shares, explain how those rights differ from the equivalent rights that attach to the shares in the largest class (or next largest class if the class which includes the employee shares is the largest),

(g) state whether the employee shares are redeemable and, if they are, at whose option,

(h) state whether there are any restrictions on the transferability of the employee shares and, if there are, what those restrictions are,

(i) state whether any of the requirements of sections 561 and 562 of the Companies Act 2006 are excluded in the case of the employee shares (existing shareholders' right of pre-emption), and

(j) state whether the employee shares are subject to drag-along rights or tag-along rights and, if they are, explain the effect of the shares being so subject."

25E: Page 34, line 38, at end insert-

"( ) Where a company makes an offer to an individual for the individual to become an employee shareholder, an acceptance by the individual of the offer is of no effect unless seven days have passed since the day on which the offer was made."

25F: Page 35, line 23, at end insert-

""drag-along rights", in relation to shares in a company, means the right of the holders of a majority of the shares, where they are selling their shares, to require the holders of the minority to sell theirs;""

25G Page 35, line 25, at end insert-

""tag-along rights", in relation to shares in a company, means the right of the holders of a minority of the shares to sell their shares, where the holders of the majority are selling theirs, on the same terms as those on which the holders of the majority are doing so"

Motion A

Moved by Viscount Younger of Leckie:

That this House do not insist on its Amendment 25, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 25A, do agree with the Commons in their Amendments 25C, 25D, 25F and 25G to the words restored to the Bill by that disagreement, and do disagree with the Commons in their Amendment 25E to the words so restored but do propose the following Amendments in lieu-

25H: Page 34, line 38, at end insert-

"( ) Agreement between a company and an individual that the individual is to become an employee shareholder is of no effect unless, before the agreement is made-

(a) the individual, having been given the statement referred to in subsection (1)(ca), receives advice from a relevant independent adviser as to the terms and effect of the proposed agreement, and

(b) seven days have passed since the day on which the individual receives the advice.

( ) Any reasonable costs incurred by the individual in obtaining the advice (whether or not the individual becomes an employee shareholder) which would, but for this subsection, have to be met by the individual are instead to be met by the company."

25J: Page 35, line 25, at end insert-

""relevant independent adviser" has the meaning that it has for the purposes of section 203(3)(c);"

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Bishop0 28.0%
Con177 (+1 tell) 081.7%
Crossbench29 1623.6%
DUP1 025.0%
Independent Labour0 1100.0%
Judge0 214.3%
Lab0 139 (+2 tell)62.9%
LDem61 (+1 tell) 167.7%
Non-affiliated1 03.4%
Other0 133.3%
PC0 150.0%
UUP2 066.7%
Total:271 16354.3%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Adebowale Crossbenchaye
Lord Berkeley of KnightonCrossbenchaye
Lord Bilimoria Crossbenchaye
The Earl of ClancartyCrossbenchaye
Lord Crisp Crossbenchaye
Lord Elystan-Morgan Crossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Harries of PentregarthCrossbench (front bench)aye
Baroness Hayman Crossbenchaye
Lord Hennessy of NympsfieldCrossbenchaye
Baroness Hollins Crossbenchaye
Lord Kerr of KinlochardCrossbench (front bench)aye
Baroness Kidron Crossbenchaye
Baroness Morgan of DrefelinCrossbenchaye
Lord Ouseley Crossbenchaye
Lord Palmer Crossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Patel of BradfordCrossbenchaye
Baroness Richardson of CalowCrossbenchaye
Baroness Brinton LDemaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive