London Local Authorities and Transport for London (No. 2) Bill — Clause 19 — Introduction of the Offence of Unlawful Use of Charging Point — 11 Sep 2013 at 22:15

Dominic Grieve MP, Beaconsfield did not vote.

The majority of MPs voted for an offence of using an electric vehicle charging point for a purpose other than charging a vehicle. For an offence to be committed the act would need to be in contravention of a sign displayed on the apparatus noting the existence of the offence. Exemptions include having permission, or believing to have permission, for an alternative use of the charging point.

MPs were considering the London Local Authorities and Transport for London (No. 2) Bill[1]. The amendment rejected in this vote was amendment 40:

  • Page 14, line 33 leave out Clause 19.

Clause 19 of the Bill[2] related to electric vehicle charging points and was titled Offence of unlawful use of charging point and stated:

  • (1) A person shall be guilty of an offence and liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding level 3 on the standard scale if he uses charging apparatus in contravention of a sign displayed on the apparatus which indicates that—
  • (a) the apparatus is not to be used for any purpose other than charging a vehicle; and
  • (b) it is an offence to so use the apparatus.
  • (2) A person is not guilty of an offence under subsection (1) if—
  • (a) he had the permission of the person who operated the charging apparatus at the time to use the charging apparatus for the purpose in question; or
  • (b) he had reasonable cause to believe he had such permission; or
  • (c) at the time there was on the charging apparatus an indication given by the person who operated the charging apparatus that it could be used for the purpose for which it was used.

It appears the intent was that the law ought apply to charging points on roads or car parks run by London borough councils or Transport for London.

==

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con23 (+2 tell) 4 (+2 tell)010.2%
Lab8 003.1%
LDem5 008.9%
Total:36 407.1%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Peter BoneWellingboroughCon (front bench)aye
Christopher ChopeChristchurchCon (front bench)tellaye
Philip DaviesShipleyCon (front bench)aye
Philip HolloboneKetteringCon (front bench)aye
David NuttallBury NorthCon (front bench)tellaye
Andrew TurnerIsle of WightCon (front bench)aye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive