Pensions Bill — Clause 24 — Prevent Amendment of Pension Schemes for Former Nationalised Industries Following State Pension Changes — 29 Oct 2013 at 18:00

John Penrose MP, Weston-Super-Mare voted not to prevent a number of pension schemes relating to previously nationalised industries being amended following the introduction of the single state pension.

The majority of MPs voted not to prevent a number of pension schemes relating to previously nationalised industries being amended following the introduction of the single state pension and consequent abolition of the option to opt out of the additional (second) state pension.

MPs were considering the Pensions Bill[1]. The amendment rejected in this vote was:

  • Amendment 37, page 11, line 40, at end insert—
  • ‘(c) a scheme in respect of any of its terms which relate to persons protected under the terms of—
  • (i) the Electricity (Protected Persons) (England and Wales) Pension Regulations 1990;
  • (ii) the Electricity (Protected Persons) (Scotland) Pension Regulations 1990;
  • (iii) the Electricity (Protected Persons) (Northern Ireland) Pension Regulations 1992;
  • (iv) the Railway Pensions (Protection and Designation of Schemes) Order 1984;
  • (v) the London Transport Pensions Arrangements Order 2000;
  • (vi) the Coal Industry (Protected Persons) Pensions Regulations 1994; or
  • (vii) the nuclear industry employees protected by Schedule 8 of the Energy Act 2004.

This would have taken effect on Clause 24[2] of the Bill, which provided for the abolition of the provision which allowed employers to contract their employees out of the additional pension on the condition that they would provide an occupational pension meeting certain statutory requirements

Clause 24 contained a provision to allow an employer to amend an occupational pension scheme in relation to some or all of its members to take account of increases in the employer’s national insurance contributions as a conseuence of the abolition of the option to contract out of the additional state pension.

Clause 24 contained an exemption preventing the amendment of a public service pension scheme or other schemes specified in regulations. The amendment rejected in this vote sought to add additional pension schemes (those related to former nationalised industries) to those which may not be amended.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con242 (+1 tell) 0079.7%
DUP0 5062.5%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 10100.0%
Lab0 211 (+2 tell)082.6%
LDem47 (+1 tell) 0085.7%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 30100.0%
SNP0 5083.3%
Total:290 230081.5%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive