Energy Bill — Commons Reason — 11 Dec 2013 at 16:24
Lord Prescott voted in the minority (Content).
Moved by Baroness Verma
That this House do not insist on its Amendment 105, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 105A.
105: Page 125, line 3, at end insert-
“(iii) substantial pollution abatement equipment dealing with oxides of sulphur, oxides of nitrogen, heavy metal emissions or particles is fitted to the generating station.”
Commons Disagreement and Reason
The Commons disagree to Lords Amendment No 105 for the following reason-
Because it is inappropriate for the fitting of pollution abatement equipment to cause the emissions limit duty to apply to existing generating stations.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Con||161 (+1 tell)||1||70.9%|
|Crossbench||19||44 (+2 tell)||34.0%|
|LDem||75 (+1 tell)||4||77.7%|
|Lord Renton of Mount Harry||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Aberdare||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Viscount Craigavon||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Craig of Radley||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Deech||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Fellowes||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Kakkar||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Laming||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Mawson||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Rowe-Beddoe||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord St John of Bletso||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Sutherland of Houndwood||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Turnbull||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|The Earl of Glasgow||LDem||aye|
|Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Rennard||LDem (front bench)||aye|