Mesothelioma Bill — Clause 4 — Diffuse Mesothelioma Payment Scheme to Be At Least 80% of Average Civil Compensation Payments — 7 Jan 2014 at 17:00

Stewart Jackson MP, Peterborough voted not to require payments under the Diffuse Mesothelioma Payment Scheme be no less than 80 per cent of the average civil compensation recovered by mesothelioma claimants.

The majority of MPs voted not to require payments under the Diffuse Mesothelioma Payment Scheme be no less than 80 per cent of the average civil compensation recovered by mesothelioma claimants.

The payment scheme is for those illegally exposed to asbestos by their employers who have not obtained payments for damages by other routes.

MPs were considering the Mesothelioma Bill[1]. The amendment rejected in this vote was:

  • Amendment 1, page 3, line 5 , at end insert ‘but shall not be less than 80 per cent of the average civil compensation recovered by mesothelioma claimants.

This would have affected clause 4 of the Bill and would have added the above words to a sentence stating:

  • The amount of a payment under the scheme is to be determined in accordance with the scheme.

==

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con243 (+2 tell) 12084.3%
DUP0 7087.5%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent0 1050.0%
Lab0 215 (+2 tell)084.4%
LDem42 1076.8%
PC0 2066.7%
SDLP0 2066.7%
SNP0 5083.3%
Total:285 247083.5%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Steve BarclayNorth East CambridgeshireCon (front bench)aye
Andrew BinghamHigh PeakCon (front bench)aye
Conor BurnsBournemouth WestConaye
Tracey CrouchChatham and AylesfordCon (front bench)aye
Roger GaleNorth ThanetCon (front bench)aye
Zac GoldsmithRichmond ParkCon (front bench)aye
Phillip LeeBracknellCon (front bench)aye
Jeremy LefroyStaffordCon (front bench)aye
Andrew PercyBrigg and GooleCon (front bench)aye
Caroline SpelmanMeridenCon (front bench)aye
Craig WhittakerCalder ValleyCon (front bench)aye
Sarah WollastonTotnesCon (front bench)aye
John LeechManchester, WithingtonLDemaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive