Offender Rehabilitation Bill — New Clause 1 — Probation Service Reform: Parliamentary Approval — 14 Jan 2014 at 16:00
John Penrose MP, Weston-Super-Mare voted not to require any proposals for restructuring or reforming the the probation service be approved by both Houses of Parliament.
The majority of MPs voted not to require any proposals for restructuring or reforming the probation service be approved by both Houses of Parliament.
The following proposed new clause for the Offender Rehabilitation Bill was rejected in the vote:
- The Secretary of State may not undertake a national restructure or reform of the provision of probation services unless the proposals have first been laid before, and approved by a resolution of, both House of Parliament
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||271 (+2 tell)||0||0||89.5%|
|Lab||0||229 (+2 tell)||0||89.9%|
|Stephen Gilbert||St Austell and Newquay||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Nick Harvey||North Devon||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|John Leech||Manchester, Withington||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Adrian Sanders||Torbay||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Ian Swales||Redcar||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Mark Williams||Ceredigion||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Roger Williams||Brecon and Radnorshire||LDem (front bench)||aye|