Offender Rehabilitation Bill — New Clause 4 — Probation Reform Pilot Schemes — 14 Jan 2014 at 17:45
John Penrose MP, Weston-Super-Mare voted not to require an independently evaluated pilot scheme, with the results laid before Parliament, before restructuring the probation service nationally.
The majority of MPs voted not to require an independently evaluated pilot scheme, with the results laid before Parliament, before restructuring the probation service nationally.
MPs were considering the Offender Rehabilitation Bill. The text of the proposed new clause which was rejected in this vote was:
- The Secretary of State may not undertake a national restructure of the provision of probation services until the proposals have first been subject to an independently evaluated pilot scheme, and the results of that evaluation laid before both Houses of Parliament.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||270 (+2 tell)||0||0||89.2%|
|Lab||0||225 (+2 tell)||0||88.3%|
|Annette Brooke||Mid Dorset and North Poole||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Andrew George||St Ives||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Nick Harvey||North Devon||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Greg Mulholland||Leeds North West||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|John Pugh||Southport||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Adrian Sanders||Torbay||LDem (front bench)||aye|
|Mark Williams||Ceredigion||LDem (front bench)||aye|