Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Bill — Report (3rd Day) — 20 Jan 2014 at 15:54

Lord Shipley voted with the majority (Not-Content).

Amendment 92

Moved by Lord Harris of Haringey)

92: Before Clause 111, insert the following new Clause-

“Crime and disorder reduction: development control

(1) The Secretary of State shall designate a body representative of chief officers of police for the purposes of this section.

(2) A body designated under this section shall publish guidelines that specify for a particular type of development the measures that should be included in that development to promote-

(a) crime and disorder reduction, and

(b) the prevention of anti-social behaviour.

(3) Guidelines under this section shall only be produced following consultation with organisations that represent-

(a) local authorities, and

(b) persons engaged in the design and construction of developments requiring planning permission.

(4) A planning authority may, in respect of any application that it receives for planning permission, specify as a condition for the approval of that planning permission that the development concerned must follow guidelines published under this section.

(5) A planning authority may only specify a condition under subsection (4) if it is satisfied that to do so would promote-

(a) crime and disorder reduction, or

(b) the prevention of anti-social behaviour.”

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Bishop2 09.1%
Con135 (+1 tell) 059.4%
Crossbench22 2725.7%
Green0 1100.0%
Independent Labour0 1100.0%
Judge1 113.3%
Lab0 138 (+2 tell)62.5%
LDem65 (+1 tell) 064.1%
Other0 1100.0%
PC0 150.0%
UKIP1 033.3%
UUP0 150.0%
Total:226 17150.5%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Aberdare Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Bilimoria Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Butler-Sloss Crossbench (front bench)no
The Earl of ClancartyCrossbenchno
Lord Crisp Crossbenchno
Lord Fellowes Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Greenway Crossbenchno
Lord Hannay of ChiswickCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Harries of PentregarthCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Jones of BirminghamCrossbenchno
Lord Kerr of KinlochardCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Laming Crossbench (front bench)no
The Earl of LyttonCrossbench (front bench)no
Baroness O'Loan Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness O'Neill of BengarveCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Pannick Crossbenchno
Lord Patel Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Rowe-Beddoe Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Scott of FoscoteCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Stirrup Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Thomas of SwynnertonCrossbenchno
Lord Wright of RichmondCrossbenchno
Viscount Falkland LDemaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive