Transparency of Lobbying, Non-Party Campaigning and Trade Union Administration Bill — Commons Reasons and Amendments — 28 Jan 2014 at 17:01
Lord Shipley was Not-Content.
Motion B agreed.
Moved by Lord Wallace of Tankerness
That this House do not insist on its Amendment 108 to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 108A.
Lords Amendment 108: Schedule 3, page 57, line 14, at end insert-
“Exclusions of background staff costs
1A Nothing in sub-paragraphs (3) to (5) of paragraph 1 shall be taken as extending to any expenses incurred in respect of remuneration or allowances payable to any member of staff (whether permanent or otherwise) of the third party.”
COMMONS DISAGREEMENT AND REASON
The Commons disagree to Lords Amendment No 108 for the following reason-
108A:Because a third party’s expenditure on staff should not be excluded from the definition of “controlled expenditure” for the purposes of Part 6 of the Political Parties, Elections and Referendums Act 2000.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Not-Content)||Minority (Content)||Turnout|
|Con||155 (+1 tell)||1||68.6%|
|Crossbench||6||64 (+2 tell)||37.7%|
|LDem||77 (+1 tell)||0||75.7%|
|Lord Armstrong of Ilminster||Crossbench||no|
|Viscount Craigavon||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Deech||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Martin of Springburn||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Powell of Bayswater||Crossbench (front bench)||no|