Care Bill — New Clause 9 — Require Annual Report on Social Care Funding Levels — 10 Mar 2014 at 19:00

Dominic Grieve MP, Beaconsfield voted not to require an annual report on the sufficiency of social care funding.

The majority of MPs voted not to require an annual report on the sufficiency of social care funding.

MPs were considering the Care Bill[1]. The proposed new clause rejected in this vote was:

  • (1) The Joint Care and Support Reform Programme Board must inform the Secretary of State by an annual written report that it is satisfied whether sufficient funding is in place to ensure that social care is adequately funded and that the provisions in the Act can be implemented satisfactorily.
  • (2) In subsection (1), the “Joint Care and Support Reform Programme Board” means the board of that name consisting of representatives of (but not limited to): the Local Government Association, the Association of Directors of Adult Social Services and the Department of Health.
  • (3) The report mentioned in subsection (1) should include a statement of the satisfaction of the Joint Care and Support Reform Programme Board with (but not limited to)—
  • (a) adequacy of the funding of the provisions in this Act,
  • (b) on-going costs of implementation,
  • (c) an additional five yearly review of the short and medium term cost of setting the eligibility criteria at the level set out in regulations.

==

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Alliance1 00100.0%
Con237 (+1 tell) 1078.4%
DUP1 0012.5%
Green0 10100.0%
Lab0 602.3%
LDem37 (+1 tell) 3 (+2 tell)076.8%
PC0 2066.7%
Total:276 13046.4%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Bob BlackmanHarrow EastCon (front bench)aye
Paul BurstowSutton and CheamLDemaye
Andrew GeorgeSt IvesLDem (front bench)tellaye
Julian HuppertCambridgeLDem (front bench)aye
Adrian SandersTorbayLDem (front bench)aye
David WardBradford EastLDem (front bench)tellaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive