Care Bill — New Clause 11 — Human Rights Act to Apply to All Providers of Regulated Social Care — 10 Mar 2014 at 19:00
Zac Goldsmith MP, Richmond Park voted against making it unlawful for any provider of regulated social care to act in a manner incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights.
The majority of MPs voted against making it unlawful for any provider of regulated social care to act in a manner incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. It was already unlawful for public authorities to act in a manner incompatible with the convention rights.
MPs were considering the Care Bill. The proposed new clause rejected in this vote was:
- (1) A person (“P”) who provides regulated social care for an individual under arrangements made with P by a public authority, or paid for by a public authority, is to be taken for the purposes of subsection (3)(b) of section 6 of the Human Rights Act 1998 (acts of public authorities) to be exercising a function of a public nature in doing so.
- (2) This section applies to persons providing services regulated by the Care Quality Commission.
- (3) In this section “social care” has the same meaning as in the Health and Social Care Act 2008.’.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||238 (+1 tell)||0||0||78.4%|
|Lab||0||203 (+2 tell)||0||79.5%|
|LDem||41 (+1 tell)||1||0||76.8%|
|Greg Mulholland||Leeds North West||LDem (front bench)||aye|