Care Bill — New Clause 16 — Detemination of Services to Continue at NHS Trusts under Administration — 11 Mar 2014 at 17:45
Zac Goldsmith MP, Richmond Park voted to allow local commissioners, and commissioners at affected trusts, determine which services must continue to be provided by a NHS trust which has gone into administration; as well as to require public consultation prior to changes to services at affected trusts.
The majority of MPs voted against allowing those who commission services at a NHS trust which goes into administration, and commissioners at affected trusts, to determine which services must continue to be provided.
This relates to the measures which come into effect when a trust is deemed unable, or likely to become unable, to pay its debts.
MPs were considering the Care Bill when they rejected a proposed new clause. The rejected new clause would have required wider consultation of trusts affected by decisions made by administrators of failed NHS trusts, and would have restricted the scope of the Secretary of State's consideration of the administrator's report and regulator's decision. The rejected new clause would also have introduced additional requirements for public consultation where there are changes proposed to services provided by an affected trust.
The proposed new clause rejected in this vote was accompanied by an explanatory statement saying it:
- ensures that all commissioners of services affected by a trust special administrator’s report have the right to define local specified services;
- clarifies that, save for the trust in administration, local commissioners remain the decision makers for services they commission; and
- restores public engagement for changes other than for a trust in administration.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||253 (+2 tell)||7||0||85.9%|
|Lab||0||222 (+2 tell)||0||86.8%|
|Angie Bray||Ealing Central and Acton||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Nick de Bois||Enfield North||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Zac Goldsmith||Richmond Park||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Philip Hollobone||Kettering||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Jeremy Lefroy||Stafford||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Jason McCartney||Colne Valley||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Bob Stewart||Beckenham||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Greg Mulholland||Leeds North West||LDem (front bench)||aye|