Criminal Justice and Courts Bill — Commons Reasons and Amendments — 9 Dec 2014 at 18:35

Lord Prescott voted with the majority (Content).

Motion B

Moved by Lord Faulks

That this House do not insist on its Amendments 97, 98, 99, 100, 101 and 102, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 102A.

Lords Amendments

97: Clause 64, page 64, line 35, leave out “must” and insert “may”

98: Clause 64, page 64, line 37, leave out “not” and insert “decline to”

99: Clause 64, page 65, line 10, leave out “must” and insert “may”

100: Clause 64, page 65, line 13, leave out “must” and insert “may”

101: Clause 64, page 65, line 33, leave out “must” and insert “may”

102: Clause 64, page 65, line 40, leave out “must” and insert “may”

Commons Reason

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendments Nos. 97, 98, 99, 100, 101 and 102 for the following reason-

102A: Because it is appropriate to impose duties, rather than to confer discretions, on the High Court and the Upper Tribunal in connection with judicial review proceedings in which it is highly likely that the outcome for the applicant would not have been substantially different if the conduct complained of had not occurred.

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop3 013.0%
Con9 148 (+1 tell)66.7%
Crossbench50 (+1 tell) 529.8%
DUP0 133.3%
Green1 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge4 (+1 tell) 033.3%
Lab166 074.1%
LDem24 47 (+1 tell)66.7%
Non-affiliated1 03.1%
PC1 050.0%
UUP1 1100.0%
Total:261 20255.9%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Cormack Con (front bench)aye
Lord Deben Conaye
Lord Denham Conaye
Lord Forsyth of DrumleanCon (front bench)aye
Lord Glenarthur Con (front bench)aye
Lord Higgins Conaye
Lord Howe of AberavonConaye
Lord Northbrook Conaye
Lord Patten of BarnesConaye
Lord Stevens of LudgateConaye
Lord Curry of KirkharleCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Greenway Crossbenchno
Lord Kilclooney Crossbenchno
Lord Powell of BayswaterCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Thomas of SwynnertonCrossbenchno
Lord Alliance LDemaye
Lord Bradshaw LDemaye
Lord Carlile of BerriewLDemaye
Lord Cotter LDem (front bench)aye
Baroness Doocey LDem (front bench)aye
Viscount Falkland LDem (front bench)aye
Lord Goodhart LDemaye
Lord Greaves LDem (front bench)aye
Baroness Hussein-Ece LDemaye
Lord Lester of Herne HillLDem (front bench)aye
Baroness Ludford LDemaye
Lord Macdonald of River GlavenLDemaye
Lord Maclennan of RogartLDem (front bench)aye
Lord Marks of Henley-on-ThamesLDem (front bench)aye
Lord Phillips of SudburyLDemaye
Lord Rennard LDemaye
Lord Rodgers of Quarry BankLDem (front bench)aye
Lord Scriven LDemaye
Lord Sharkey LDem (front bench)aye
Lord Smith of CliftonLDem (front bench)aye
Lord Storey LDemaye
Lord Strasburger LDem (front bench)aye
Lord Thomas of GresfordLDemaye
Baroness Thomas of WinchesterLDem (front bench)aye
Baroness Tonge LDemaye
Baroness Williams of CrosbyLDemaye
Lord Maginnis of DrumglassNon-affiliatedno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive