Criminal Justice and Courts Bill — Commons Reasons and Amendments — 9 Dec 2014 at 19:34

Lord Prescott voted with the majority (Content).

Motion C

Moved by Lord Faulks

That this House do not insist on its Amendments 103, 104, 105 and 106, to which the Commons have disagreed for their Reason 106A, but do propose Amendments 106B and 106C in lieu.

Lords Amendments

103: Clause 65, page 66, line 10, after “paragraph” insert “or, notwithstanding a failure to do so, the court in its discretion considers that it is nevertheless appropriate to grant the applicant leave to make the application for judicial review”

104: Clause 65, page 66, line 32, after “paragraph” insert “or, notwithstanding a failure to do so, the tribunal in its discretion considers that it is nevertheless appropriate to grant the applicant permission or leave to apply for relief”

105: Clause 66, page 67, line 1, leave out “must” and insert “may”

106: Clause 66, page 67, line 7, leave out “must” and insert “may”

Commons Reason

The Commons disagree to Lords Amendments Nos. 103, 104, 105 and 106 for the following reason-

106: Because it is appropriate to impose duties, rather than confer discretions, on the High Court, the Upper Tribunal and the Court of Appeal in connection with information about the financing of applications for judicial review.

Amendments in lieu

106B: Clause 65, page 66, line 21, at end insert-

“(3AA) Rules of court under subsection (3)(b) that specify information identifying those who are, or are likely to be, sources of financial support must provide that only a person whose financial support (whether direct or indirect) exceeds, or is likely to exceed, a level set out in the rules has to be identified.

This subsection does not apply to rules that specify information described in subsection (3A)(b).”

106C: Clause 65, page 66, line 43, at end insert-

“(3AA) Tribunal Procedure Rules under subsection (3)(b) that specify information identifying those who are, or are likely to be, sources of financial support must provide that only a person whose financial support (whether direct or indirect) exceeds, or is likely to exceed, a level set out in the rules has to be identified.

This subsection does not apply to rules that specify information described in subsection (3A)(b).”

Debate in Parliament | Source |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop2 08.7%
Con0 141 (+1 tell)59.9%
Crossbench30 (+1 tell) 117.0%
DUP0 133.3%
Green1 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge3 (+1 tell) 026.7%
Lab148 066.1%
LDem12 47 (+1 tell)55.6%
PC1 050.0%
Total:198 19048.9%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Flather Conaye
Lord Kilclooney Crossbenchno
Lord Carlile of BerriewLDemaye
Lord Cotter LDem (front bench)aye
Viscount Falkland LDem (front bench)aye
Lord Goodhart LDemaye
Lord Greaves LDem (front bench)aye
Baroness Linklater of ButterstoneLDemaye
Baroness Ludford LDemaye
Lord Macdonald of River GlavenLDemaye
Lord Maclennan of RogartLDem (front bench)aye
Lord Marks of Henley-on-ThamesLDem (front bench)aye
Lord Thomas of GresfordLDemaye
Baroness Tonge LDemaye
Lord Tyler LDemaye
Baroness Williams of CrosbyLDemaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive