Finance Bill — Clause 43 — Review of Impact of Rise in Insurance Premium Tax — 8 Sep 2015 at 17:45
Dominic Grieve MP, Beaconsfield voted against requiring a review of the impact of any rise in insurance premium tax.
The majority of MPs voted against requiring a review of the impact of any rise in insurance premium tax.
MPs were considering the Finance Bill:
The amendment rejected in this vote was:
- amendment 1, page 59, line 19, at end add -
- “(6) The Chancellor of the Exchequer shall, within three months of the passing of this Act, undertake, and lay before both Houses of Parliament, a review of the impact of any further rise in the standard rate of insurance premium tax with particular attention to the impact on—
- (a) the price charged for insurance policies; and
- (b) the take-up of insurance policies”.
Had it not been rejected this amendment would have added the above text to the end of clause 43 of the Bill titled "Insurance premium tax".
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (No)||Minority (Aye)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||308 (+2 tell)||0||0||93.9%|
|Lab||0||195 (+2 tell)||0||84.9%|