Access to Medical Treatments (Innovation) Bill — Database of Innovative Treatments — Departure from Accepted Practice — Money — 3 Nov 2015 at 15:55
Kevan Jones MP, North Durham voted against a database of innovative medical treatments.
The majority of MPs voted in favour of a database of innovative medical treatments.
The majority of MPs taking part voted in favour of a motion stating:
- That, for the purposes of any Act resulting from the Access to Medical Treatments (Innovation) Bill, it is expedient to authorise the payment out of money provided by Parliament of any increase attributable to the Act in the sums payable under any other Act out of money so provided.
- Permits the establishment, by Government, of a database of innovative medical treatments carried out by doctors, including the results of such treatments. The database would cover England only.
-  Access to Medical Treatments (Innovation) Bill
-  Explanatory notes to the Access to Medical Treatments (Innovation) Bill
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Aye)||Minority (No)||Both||Turnout|
|Con||281 (+2 tell)||6||0||87.6%|
|Lab||0||164 (+2 tell)||0||71.9%|
|Heidi Allen||South Cambridgeshire||Con (front bench)||no|
|John Baron||Basildon and Billericay||Con (front bench)||no|
|Bob Blackman||Harrow East||Con (front bench)||no|
|Peter Bottomley||Worthing West||Con (front bench)||no|
|Tania Mathias||Twickenham||Con (front bench)||no|
|Sarah Wollaston||Totnes||Con (front bench)||no|