Policing and Crime Bill — New Clause 60 — Report on Operation of Child Abduction Warning Notices — 13 Jun 2016 at 21:12

Patrick McLoughlin MP, Derbyshire Dales voted voted against requiring a report on the operation of Child Abduction Warning Notices.

The majority of MPs voted against requiring a report on the operation of Child Abduction Warning Notices.

MPs were considering the Policing and Crime Bill.[1]

The proposed new clause rejected in this vote was titled: Duty to report on Child Abduction Warning Notices and stated:

  • “(1) Each police force in England and Wales must report to the Secretary of State each year on—
  • (a) the number of Child Abduction Warning Notices issued;
  • (b) the number of Child Abduction Warning Notices breached; and
  • (c) the number of Sexual Risk Orders and Sexual Harm Prevention Orders issued following the breach of a Child Abduction Warning Notice.
  • (2) The Secretary of State must prepare and publish a report each year on—
  • (a) the number of Child Abduction Warning Notices issued in each police force in England and Wales;
  • (b) the number of Child Abduction Warning Notices breached in each police force in England and Wales; and
  • (c) the number of Sexual Risk Orders and Sexual Harm Prevention Orders issued following the breach of a Child Abduction Warning Notice in each police force in England and Wales and must lay a copy of the report before Parliament.

An attempt to establish Child Abduction Warning Notices on a statutory basis was rejected in a previous vote in February 2015.[2] As described at the time of that vote they were orders which ban an individual from being in the company of a specified child. At the time of this vote police forces were issuing the orders regardless of the lack of a statutory basis for them.[3]

==

Debate in Parliament |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con257 (+2 tell) 0078.5%
DUP0 3037.5%
Independent0 1033.3%
Lab0 141 (+2 tell)061.9%
LDem0 5062.5%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 2066.7%
UUP0 20100.0%
Total:257 157071.1%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive