Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence (Ratification of Convention) Bill — Third Reading — 24 Feb 2017 at 12:50

Dominic Grieve MP, Beaconsfield did not vote.

The majority of MPs taking part voted against ratifying a European convention aimed at preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence.

MPs were considering the Preventing and Combating Violence Against Women and Domestic Violence (Ratification of Convention) Bill[1].

The motion supported by the majority of MPs in this vote was:

  • That the Bill be now read a Third time.

Support for the motion enabled the Bill to continue on its path to becoming law.

The Bill had been amended during its consideration by MPs[2] to omit the key operative clause which would have required the Government to take all reasonable steps as soon as reasonably practicable to enable the United Kingdom to become compliant with the Council of Europe Convention on preventing and combating violence against women and domestic violence, Treaty no. 210 (the “Istanbul Convention”).

The Bill following amendment requires the Secretary of State to report on the timescale within which she expects the Istanbul Convention to be ratified, rather than the date. An amendment was also made removing a requirement for an annual report on the UK's compliance with the convention.

The convention contains the following clauses, among others:

  • Parties shall take the necessary legislative and other measures to promote and protect the right for everyone, particularly women, to live free from violence in both the public and the private sphere.
  • Parties condemn all forms of discrimination against women and take, without delay, the necessary legislative and other measures to prevent it, in particular by:
  • –embodying in their national constitutions or other appropriate legislation the principle of equality between women and men and ensuring the practical realisation of this principle;
  • –prohibiting discrimination against women, including through the use of sanctions, where appropriate;
  • –abolishing laws and practices which discriminate against women

==

Debate in Parliament |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Con44 (+1 tell) 1 (+2 tell)014.5%
Independent2 0066.7%
Lab44 0019.0%
LDem2 0022.2%
SNP46 (+1 tell) 0087.0%
Total:138 1022.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Christopher ChopeChristchurchCon (front bench)tellno
Philip DaviesShipleyCon (front bench)no
David NuttallBury NorthCon (front bench)tellno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

There are lots of plans afoot, including extensive redevelopment of the site and plans for new functionality. To keep up with what's happening, please check out the blog. We're working on updating all the contact details throughout the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Advertisement - Helping keeping PublicWhip alive