Pension Schemes Bill — New Clause One — Underwriting of Certain Occupational Pension Schemes — 29 Mar 2017 at 17:18
Jeff Smith MP, Manchester, Withington voted in the minority (Teller for the Ayes).
The majority of MPs voted against the Government underwriting certain occupational pension schemes.
The proposed new clause[2] rejected in this vote was titled: Funder of the last resort and stated:
- Notwithstanding the provisions of section 8, the Secretary of State shall make provision for a funder of last resort, to manage any cases where the Master Trust has insufficient resources to meet the cost of complying with subsection (3)(b) of that section.
See also: Debate on the rejected new clause on the 22nd of March 2017
The motion rejected in this vote was:
- That the clause be read a Second time.
==
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
Con | 282 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 86.1% |
DUP | 5 | 0 | 0 | 62.5% |
Independent | 0 | 1 | 0 | 33.3% |
Lab | 0 | 176 (+2 tell) | 0 | 77.4% |
LDem | 0 | 8 | 0 | 88.9% |
PC | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
SDLP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 66.7% |
SNP | 0 | 40 | 0 | 74.1% |
UUP | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 289 | 230 | 0 | 81.5% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |